Scientific integrity: Ten rules of conduct at LION
General
1. In research, quality must take priority over quantitative aspects.
Data
2. The original experimental results must be documented completely, clearly and accurately.
3. The interpretation of data and outcomes of experiments should be made on the basis of scientific judgment only.
Credits
4. A person who through his personal work has made a significant scientific contribution to the research work should be listed as an author.
5. The head of the research project guarantees the overall accuracy of the content of the publication. The other authors are responsible for the accuracy of those statements that they are able to verify on the basis of their position in the group.
6. In publications, earlier results from other authors are given credit by references and / or quotations.
Conflicts of interest
7. Persons who are contacted by editors, researchers or sponsors as experts to assess the research work of third parties that are in direct competition with their own work must either refuse or declare the conflict of interests involved.
8. Collaboration with a third party, eg industry, may not lead to a bias in scientific decisions. New scientific information or discoveries will not be withheld from publication; this rule should be clear to all parties when starting the collaboration.
Procedures
9. All parts of the research system have a responsibility to recognize and respond to misconduct. If a violation of ethical standards is observed, this will be reported to the scientific director.
10. If a conflict of interest arises, or a person is asked to violate ethical standards, this person will discuss this with his / her supervisor. If the situation is such that this is not possible, this person will report to the scientific director.
A significant transfer by Dmitry Yakubovskiy, candidate of physical and mathematical sciences, senior scientist in science at the Institute of Theoretical Physics IM. M.M. Bogolyubov National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine:
1. In the process of preliminaries, the mother is guilty of priority over several aspects.
2. The original results were described as accurate as possible.
3. Interpretation of the given and the visnovka until the end of the day, but they are broken down for the presentation of scientific analysis.
4. The person, yaka zrobila significant scientific additions to the robot for the help of a special robot, maє but was indicated by the author of the robot.
5. The lead author of the scientific group of authors in the publication will guarantee the publication of the publication's warehouse. Reshta of the authors of the opinion for the quality is quiet, as the stench of the building has been reconverted based on the sphere of the efficiency in the group.
6. In publications, the previous results of the authors will be recognized as a sign of the help and / or taking in the bows of the text.
7. Individuals, before which animals were turned into, naukovtsi or sponsor for the assessment of scientific robots of three individuals, as they compete with them with the power of science robots, they may or may not see, or declare the end of the conflict of interests.
8. The facts of participation with third persons, for example, promislovistu, do not lose sight of science. New science information, because there is no way to see the criterion, but it cannot be seen from the publication; The whole rule is cleverly understood by all partners on the cob of spіvrobіtnіstva.
9. All parts of the scientific system may be susceptible to the failure of the given data and the reason for them. As soon as the destruction of ethical standards was spared, it was not possible for the Science Director to become aware of it.
10. If there is a conflict of interests, if you ask a person to break the ethical standard, the person MAY talk about it with a scientific standard, or (it’s not a matter of course) with a scientific director.
Application template
